Nash implementation and tie-breaking rules

نویسنده

  • Mert Kimya
چکیده

I study Nash implementation when agents might use a tie-breaking rule to choose among the messages they are materially indifferent between. If the planner is endowed with the knowledge of the rule, this might expand or shrink the set of implementable social choice correspondences (SCC) depending on the particular rule used by the agents. The effect might be considerable. For instance, there exists a tie-breaking rule under which any SCC is implementable in the presence of three or more agents. If the planner is not endowed with the knowledge of the rule, then the problem of implementation is almost equivalent to double implementation in Nash and strict Nash equilibrium. A characterization is provided and it is shown that this severely limits the set of implementable SCCs. JEL classification: C72; D01; D70; D78

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Convergence of iterative voting

In multiagent systems, social choice functions can help aggregate the distinct preferences that agents have over alternatives, enabling them to settle on a single choice. Despite the basic manipulability of all reasonable voting systems, it would still be desirable to find ways to reach a stable result, i.e., a situation where no agent would wish to change its vote. One possibility is an iterat...

متن کامل

Convergence of Iterative Scoring Rules

In multiagent systems, social choice functions can help aggregate the distinct preferences that agents have over alternatives, enabling them to settle on a single choice. Despite the basic manipulability of all reasonable voting systems, it would still be desirable to find ways to reach plausible outcomes, which are stable states, i.e., a situation where no agent would wish to change its vote. ...

متن کامل

Equilibria of Plurality Voting: Lazy and Truth-Biased Voters

We present a systematic study of Plurality elections with strategic voters who,in addition to having preferences over election winners, have secondary prefer-ences, which govern their behavior when their vote cannot affect the election out-come. Specifically, we study two models that have been recently considered in theliterature [6, 17]: lazy voters, who prefer to abstain when ...

متن کامل

Complexity of Finding Equilibria of Plurality Voting Under Structured Preferences

We study the complexity of finding pure Nash equilibria in voting games over well-known restricted preference domains, such as the domains of single-peaked and single-crossing preferences. We focus on the Plurality rule, and, following the recent work of Elkind et al. [15], consider three popular tie-breaking rules (lexicographic, random-candidate, and random-voter) and two types of voters’ att...

متن کامل

Existence of Nash Equilibrium in Competitive Nonlinear Pricing Games with Incomplete Information

We model strategic competition in a market with asymmetric information as a noncooperative game in which each seller competes for a buyer of unknown type by offering the buyer a catalog of products and prices. We call this game a catalog game. Our main objective is to show that catalog games have Nash equilibria. The Nash existence problem for catalog games is particularly contentious due to pa...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Games and Economic Behavior

دوره 102  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2017